|
September 4th
September 4th, 2002
Preparing for 9/11/2002
- What to Expect
The Psychology of Market
Participants Heading Into, On and After 9/11/2002
While it would be best never to mention the subject of the
events of 9/11 other than to honor the memory of those that perished and
acknowledge the heroes of such a tragic day, it is important to realize that
commodity and stock markets will act differently because of those events as we
approach the one year anniversary of 9/11.
It is important to prepare and analyze, for your own financial
well-being, the psychology of those trading the markets to best handle the
market activity we are about to see.
Most traders avoid the psychological aspect of markets and
concentrate on charts or fundamentals, volatility or volume, advice or
commentary and so on and so forth to generate trading decisions.
However, it is at a time like this that one must focus almost entirely on
the psychology of the marketplace as it will be the dominate force in price
action over the next several weeks. What
are traders really worried about? Is
it market hysteria or reserved caution? Will
traders avoid the markets or aggressively pursue them?
Let’s look at some facts and observations to generate two theories of
market psychology.
The average investor is worried not of another terrorist
attack in and around 9-11, but in fact they are worried that everyone else is
worried about an attack and will sell stocks as a protective measure against
hysteria and massive selling. This
will cause a downturn in the market ahead of 9/11, but offer a bottom/buying
opportunity after 9/11 as the market participants will find renewed comfort in
reentering the market. Bonds will
react inversely, as the downturn in the market will offer a flight to quality
and rally in the bond market (which, not coincidentally coincides with the
technical break of the triple top high on the 30yr just the other day). Once a flight to quality is no longer in the cards bonds
should deflate to lower and more rational levels.
Want to test this theory? Ask
10 stock investors these two questions: Are
you worried the US will be attacked by terrorists on or near 9/11?
Few will answer yes. Are you
worried that investors will sell stocks ahead of 9/11?
An overwhelming amount will tell you they are.
Another theory suggests that volume will temporarily leave
the market as investors ‘freeze’ their holdings in an attempt to not act
irrationally and miss a market move. This
is supported by a fairly simple psychological premise.
The fight or flight theory suggests that when encountered by a situation
that could cause you harm, human instinct takes over and you either fight or run
away. However, when dealing with
money, which has an indirect relationship with your personal health and
well-being, one tends to do neither. This
is the origination of the buy and hold philosophy stock brokers have been
pitching clients for years. There
is little reason to doubt this occurring ahead of 9/11, when brokers are trained
ahead of time for this exact situation. Selling
is not a profitable situation for brokers if you are not buying something else.
If there is a ‘freeze’ in the average speculator’s investments then
one must look to fund and institutional traders to influence market direction
(more so than normal). Institutional traders will almost always play the safer side
of any scenario, looking to protect their assets and in turn their jobs.
If a mutual fund manager had the choice to subject themselves to an
historically volatile day or sit on the sidelines, he would intelligently sit on
the sidelines. Given recent fund
performances, he does not need to make a fortune in the market to preserve his
job or paycheck. He simply needs to
protect assets. Fund liquidation
will force a similar but slightly different scenario to the first theory.
When funds liquidate and speculators take the losses it often leads to a
prolonged price drought. A
speculator has already discounted an acceptable loss on his or her trades given
the buy and hold logic mentioned above, and the funds look good because they are
not losing money during a time of weak prices.
This will create a wait and see approach for institutional investors and
cause a lag or delay in market recovery. This
suggests the market may not reach a bottom on 9/11.
The argument against this theory is that the reason for sell pressure
will be alleviated on 9/11 and fund managers are not historically successful
when removing themselves from the market for just a few days.
History shows that funds move positions to cash for extended periods of
time and that logic would suggest that the managers apt to do so already have.
So, where does all this leave us heading into the next
few weeks? With a pending war,
terrorist activity threats heightened and an ugly market structure all pointing
to the market heading down this week, what is anyone to think but SELL!
Plus, a technical bond breakout to the upside and declining dollar all
show weakening confidence in the US heading into 9/11.
As a true contrarian would say, this offers a time to buy.
I recommend buying the S&P and selling bonds just prior to the close
on September 10th. The
market should reach a near term bottom. Short
term, aggressive traders should see the next 4 trading days as a shorting
opportunity on bounces heading into the 10th for stocks and a buying
opportunity for a continued breakout in the bond market.
Ignore technical indicators, place stops proportionate to expected gains
(tight stops = getting stopped out these next few days).
Sell rallies until Tuesday, then buy dips (stock market).
Be weary of bonds on a drop below 112.
Simple logic, simple trade techniques.
Market psychology is not difficult to apply, just difficult to gauge.
*Disclaimer: There is risk of loss in all commodities trading. Please consult a James Mound Trading Group Broker before you trade for the first time. Losses can exceed your account size and/or margin requirements. Commodities trading can be extremely risky and is not for everyone. Some option strategies have unlimited risk. Educate yourself on the risks and rewards of such investing prior to trading. James Mound Trading Group, or anyone associated with JMTG or moundreport.com, do not guarantee profits or pre-determined loss points, and are not held monetarily responsible for the trading losses of others (clients or otherwise). Past results are by no means indicative of potential future returns. Information provided is compiled by sources believed to be reliable. JMTG or its principals assume no responsibility for any errors or omissions as the information may not be complete or events may have been cancelled or rescheduled. Any copy, reprint, broadcast or distribution of this report of any kind is prohibited without the express written consent of James Mound Trading Group LLC. Total cost, or cost/credit of trade (as referred to in the trade above), includes the cost/credit of entry, commissions and fees. Typical commission is an approximate mean of commission rates amongst JMTG customers, but can be more or less depending upon the individual account/customer, services rendered, account size, trading volume, etc. Options do not necessarily move in lock step with the underlying futures movement. Commissions at JMTG range from $3 to $27.50 per side depending upon the market traded and specific commission rate charged to the client. Fees range from $2.88 to $7.50 per side depending upon the market traded.
|